Submissions are evaluated through a structured review process emphasizing methodological rigor, transparency, and reproducibility.

Research should clearly document:

​​

• Research questions or hypotheses

• Methods and procedures

• Available data or transcripts (when appropriate)

• Limitations and alternative explanations

• Careful distinction between observation and interpretation

• Operational definitions and measurable indicators are prioritized over speculative or declarative claims.
   

An advisory group of researchers and practitioners helps ensure consistency, cross-disciplinary rigor, and ethical standards across submissions.